THIS UNNAMED GEOLOGICAL formation is the likely result of wind, rain and time eroading away surface material to expose what at one time would have lava (magma) that had cooled and solidified. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
COMING INTO OR out of the Chisos Mountains, this is the northwest view and is several miles south of Panther Junction and the headquarters for Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
THE CLARET CUP is covered in barbed spines and blooms a reddish, cup-shaped flower from about April to June or July in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
THIS VIEW FROM a formation called, “The Window,” looks out from the westside of the Chisos Mountains in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
INDIAN HEAD MOUNTAIN and its southern region offers this “leaning” wall of geology at the western boundary of Big Bend National Park. The rocks of the foreground are boulders ranging from man-sized on up. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
MASSIVE AND TOWERING, this wall of the geology is at least a couple of hundrend feet high and situated in the Indian Head area of Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
WIDE-OPEN PANORAMAS and mountainous terrain such as this are routine along roadside in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
THE SOUTHWEST SIDE of the Chisos Mountains, also known as the Chisos Mountain Basin and home to the lodge in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2011 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
A FALLEN TREE is an impassable barrier in an otherwise debris-free dry riverbed in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
INDIGENOUS TO TEXAS, New Mexico and Arizona, Javelinas in Big Bend National Park genetically differ from swine. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
LOST MINE TRAIL in Big Bend National Park, looking southward over Juniper Canyon, the Chisos Mountain’s Northeast Rim and into Mexico. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
A TREE SILHOUETTED against the night sky as seen from Chisos Basin in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
THIS VIEW EAST of a volcano is an illusion of the setting sun streaming through the Chisos Basin area behind Casa Grande Peak in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
WRIGHT MOUNTAIN in background at Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
A VIEW WESTWARD after sundown from the Indian Head area of Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved.
A CAMERA COMPENSATION for the limited light after sundown provides this view westward from the Indian Head area of Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson/Camera One. All Rights Reserved.
SANTA ELENA CANYON after sunset, as seen from the Chimneys in Big Bend National Park. Copyright © 2010 by DL Tolleson/Camera One. All Rights Reserved.


Author, Photographer, Researcher, Artist, Adventurer and Buccaneer Extraordinaire

“Or at least that’s the plan each morning after coffee.”

Publication History: A Moral Conscientious Objection. Copyright © 2021 by DL Tolleson. All Rights Reserved. This material may be reproduced in whole, or in part so long as authorship attribution is included and remains unaltered.

Tolleson, DL. “A Moral Conscientious Objection.”, August 31, 2021.

Tolleson, DL. “A Moral Conscientious Objection.”, August 31, 2021.

Tolleson, DL. “A Moral Conscientious Objection.”, August 31, 2021.

Tolleson, DL. “A Moral Conscientious Objection.” (Excerpt), August 31, 2021.

Description: Health » COVID-19 » Political—4,402 words (not including 917-word introductory commentary).

Commentary: When the story of “now” is written by future historians, the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic will be universally declared controversial for having impacted practically everyone on Earth without having actually affected them.

The dichotomy of that statement is best realized by comparison to other events of significant importance, specifically the American Civil War the two World Wars and the Spanish Flu beginning in March of 1918.

In the case of the Civil War, there were an estimated 620,000 combat deaths, 476,000 wounded and 400,000 captured and missing. For every three people killed in combat, there were an estimated five deaths from diseases. The total death toll was about 1.5 million—or about 2.5% of the country’s population.

As for the global Wars… World War I incurred a range from around 15 to 22 million deaths and World War II from 70 to 85 million deaths (about 3% of the global population). The Spanish Flu ultimately infected nearly a third of the global population, (an estimated 500 million people) and deaths ranged from 17.4 million to 100 million—with the generally accepted death toll in the area of 25 to 50 million people.

The thing that all three of these events have in common is impact and affect. In all three examples, large percentages of people were impacted via direct involvement. But in all three examples, there were still many people who were not affected by the events.

The same cannot be said of the COVID-19 “alleged” pandemic.

Responsive to COVID-19, governments have imposed shutdowns of nationwide and worldwide economies, imposed various mask-wearing mandates offering questionable efficacy, and in cooperation with corporate media is bringing to bear nearly overwhelming pressure to receive vaccines that are demonstratively dangerous to health. In these ways every single person—nationwide and globally—has been affected by COVID-19.

But not everyone has been personally impacted by infection. In fact, most people haven’t. However, unlike the civil war, the two global wars and the Spanish flu, there is no way to prove who has actually died because of COVID-19.

The reason?

The virus has been so politicized that we cannot rely on official statistics. The evidence for this assertion comes directly from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and is found on the website of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and as of March 24, 2020 indicates:

Should COVID-19 be reported on the death certificate only with a confirmed test?
COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.

National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) COVID-19 Alert No. 2
NOTE: Underlining and bold emphasis are in the original text of the last paragraph of the page.

So, the government COVID death statistics are inflated with deaths from other diseases and issues. Hence, citing those numbers as indicative of a need for any mRNA vaccine is to conjure that need out of fictitious escalations of COVID-induced deaths.

In event that this evidence is thought insufficient to the assertion tendered, the aforementioned directive was clarified on April 19, 2020, during the Illinois Daily Press Briefing in which Ngozi O. Ezike, M.D., Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, indicated:

I just want to be clear in terms of the definition of people dying of COVID. So, the case definition is very simplistic. It means that at the time of death it was a COVID-positive diagnosis. So that means if you were in hospice and had already been given, you know, a few weeks to live and then you were also found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. It means that if, technically, even if you died of a clear alternative cause but you had COVID at the same time it’s still listed as a COVID death. So everyone that’s listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death.

State of Illinois | Video Excerpt of Daily Press Briefing

State of Illinois | Full Daily Press Briefing, April 19, 2020
Quote and prompting question at timestamp 21:10 through 22:26

Allow me to reiterate via quoting: “It means that if, technically, even if you died of a clear alternative cause but you had COVID at the same time it’s still listed as a COVID death. So everyone that’s listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death.”

So, yeah, COVID might not have been the cause of death, but if COVID was detected as present—even if it wasn’t the cause of death—it was counted as a COVID death.

To borrow from the legal field’s application of Latin, this is a Res Ipsa Loquitur situation that could not exist without negligence.

Res Ipsa Loquitur, means, The thing speaks for itself.

We cannot depend on the official statistics of reported deaths, which by the very admission of the CDC, are inflated with non-COVID related deaths.

Addressing that question is the purpose of the following article. The article addresses my moral objection to the mRNA vaccines due to the underlying science involved and subsequent adverse reactions and death that have overwhelmingly demonstrated the dangers involved with these products. I also touch upon the censorship of credentialed medical opinion that contends this very premise in the face of systemic misinformation and outright lies.

—DL Tolleson

DL Tolleson

I recently advocated for “using the system against itself” by recommending the FDA’s website, at which that agency notes the mRNA vaccines are offered under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). This means these vaccines are not licensed for use in the United States, are unapproved medical products and that individuals may legally refuse them.1

I have since read of instances reporting that this is already federally a supported law.2

However the problem is, what happens when the FDA actually approves an mRNA vaccine and it becomes licensed?

In that event mRNA vaccine opposition must be on other grounds—those involving religious conviction and a moral objection that I refer to as my moral, conscientious objection.

Insofar as a religious objection, one will need to express actual faith-based and theological foundations at the core of one’s objection. There are forms being made freely available for this on the Internet and rather than offer a link to those I will return to this point later in this article. And while I do have a theological conviction in that regard, I am primarily driven by a moral objection much more attuned to my life and health. Specifically, my moral objection mostly hinges on the “life” part of that phrase.

The fact is I have a moral, conscientious objection to this particular abomination of medical science due to the fact that the vaccines literally, unequivocally and irreversibly alter our cells. They do more than just “assist” or “boost” our immune systems. These vaccines alter our immune systems—and thus us—at a molecular level in a way non-mRNA vaccines do not. The problem is apparent in the very description of these vaccines: “mRNA” represents “messenger ribonucleic acid.”

To grasp the full impact of what a startling thing this is, we need to have a basic understanding of Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

We are basically familiar with the concept of DNA: It’s a molecule containing our genetic code—the very blueprint of existence. It is the essential foundation necessary to who we are and how we function. When we see a representation of our DNA, it is a long, double-stranded molecule (the famous “double helix”) made up of pieces (or “bases”) and we have these within EACH nucleus of our bodies’ some 30 trillion cells.3 These pieces, or bases, are the code of life—the genetic language of the cell. They are the blueprint4 that manufactures proteins, which in turn are the fundamental components of all living cells and include innumerable substances, such as enzymes, hormones and antibodies. These are necessary for the proper functioning of all living organisms.5

To interpret and utilize the blueprint of the DNA, something must “unzip” or “expose” the strands of the DNA, and then take that data (in the form of enzymes) and translate it “into a mobile, intermediate message, called ribonucleic acid (RNA).”6

That “something,” the thing that “translates” the data into the RNA is called “messenger RNA” (AKA, mRNA) and it carries the instructions for making proteins from a person’s DNA to a person’s cells.7 And as I indicated two paragraphs ago, proteins are fundamental components of every living cell of our body.

So in keeping with the metaphor of DNA being an individual’s blueprint, mRNA is the employee communicating the blueprint’s message of what the rest of the person’s cells are to do. It naturally follows, then, that an mRNA vaccine is a messenger employee conveying orders that are NOT being communicated from the original blueprint. This message changes the body’s cells. We are told that this “piece of mRNA that is a part of the vaccines…corresponds to a viral protein, usually a small piece of a protein found on the virus’s outer membrane” and “Individuals who get an mRNA vaccine are not exposed to the virus, nor can they become infected by the vaccine.”8

So, unlike other non-mRNA vaccines, an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine isn’t introducing a form of the virus in order to make your body develop its own immunity. Instead, it’s introducing “new software” so to speak. The answer to why there are reports of people contracting COVID-19, being disabled by various maladies and even dying—all AFTER receiving an mRNA vaccine—is because those people’s bodies reacted badly to a message that wasn’t from their original blueprint. And that’s why there are such a range of outcomes—we all have our own set of circumstances and giving everyone the same non-blueprint specific “message” renders differing results. Especially when that “message” is something cooked-up in a lab.

After having written the above “blueprint and employee messenger” analogy I wanted to verify the accuracy of this simplification. So I solicited the input of a microbiologist with whom I am acquainted. And while he assured me that my layman’s explanation was correctly communicated, he provided additional technical expertise. In the interest of transparency, clarity and fairness, the following call-out contains the relevant excerpt of his correspondence…

All true as written. I actually wrote an essay on protein synthesis way back on some final exam in college. For some reason I enjoy the mechanism of it. Messenger RNA is the single strand version of DNA formed with [sic] DNA is spliced. That splits up the individual base pairs so mRNA is just a strand of single nucleotides. That split of course creates two strands of RNA, and either can become mRNA or Transfer RNA (tRNA). Both are required to manufacture proteins. That process actually puts the DNA “back together” with one strand of mRNA and several tRNA molecules. Not that full DNA comes out the other end, but basically it could.

So mRNA vaccines actual provide the mRNA portion and use your own tRNA to manufacture the antiviral particles. Each amino acid used to manufacture proteins (there’s a limited number) attaches to a specific molecule of tRNA with a specific codon (sequence of 3 nucleotides) to bind to a specific section of mRNA, so you can generate mRNA to code for any protein you want, as long as you know the specific amino acids it’s made from.

And no, you are not exposed to the actual virus from mRNA vaccines. Vaccines used to be made from attenuated (“dead”) virus particles, and occasionally a person would get the actual disease from the vaccine. Virus particles aren’t really “living” things, anyway, since they don’t exhibit most of the requirements of life. Alone they do absolutely nothing; a host cell is required for them to reproduce. So attenuated viruses sometimes activate and do what they do. That’s why mRNA vaccines are so much safer.

His conclusion, of course, is that the mRNA vaccines are safer than non mRNA vaccines.

And while I would ordinarily yield to his expertise in this matter, the overwhelming reports of adverse mRNA vaccine reactions is demonstrative of evidence to the contrary. There is a staggering number of these adverse events. If you do your own Internet search for “problems from an mRNA vaccines” or similar search terms, you will be inundated with a list led by issues regarding spike proteins, spike protein shedding, heart issues in the very young, Bell’s palsy, etc. I’ve even seen one study indicating mRNA vaccine-induced prions may cause neurodegenerative diseases because long-term memories are maintained by prion-like proteins.9

So, it is true—and does not matter—that an mRNA vaccine will not “give” these health issues to individuals. And that statement is true because mRNA vaccines alter the cells of people in such a way as to make them susceptible to these and other debilitating health issues—including in an unacceptable percentage of times, death.10

The only reason this evidence is not leading every broadcast is that censorship has blocked the publicizing of treatments that are safer and as effective (if not even more effective) than the vaccines.

And when I write of “evidence,” I am taking into consideration data and facts that include the following checklist…

That Which is More Probable Than Not

That Which is More Likely Than Unlikely

The Preponderance of all Available Public Information

That Which Would Give a Reasonable Person Reasonable Doubt

Peter McCullough, MD Testifying To Texas Senate HHS Committe
Begin Excerpt
“I made a YouTube video with four slides from the paper, this is a peer review paper published by one of the best medical journals in the world (Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale For Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection), co-authored with 60 renowned medical doctors, published in the August 7th, 2020 issue of The American Journal of Medicine.

Four slides… And I posted it on YouTube. It went absolutely viral. And within about a week, YouTube said, ‘You violated the terms of the community.’ And that’s when Senator Johnson’s office in Washington got involved and said, ‘Oh my Gosh, this is important scientific information to help patients, in the middle of this crisis, and social media is striking it down. Based on what authority?’

Well one thing lead to another. I became the lead witness for the U.S. Senate testimony of November 19th, 2020. And the reason why there was Senate testimony is because there was a near total block on any information of treatment to patents.”
End Excerpt

Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale For Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection
by Peter McCullough, MD and 60 renowned medical doctors

Christina Parks, Ph.D. (in Cellular and Molecular Biology) Testimony for Michigan HB4471
Christina Parks received her Ph.D. in Cellular and Molecular Biology from the University of Michigan in 1999. She did her graduate research in the field of cytokine signaling. She is a co-author/contributor to six academic journal articles relevant to her graduate work and subsequent research.

Begin Excerpt
“I’m very well-versed in the science of both these mRNA gene therapy vaccines—this kind of technology as well as what a vaccine is designed to do in the body, what it can do, what it can’t do and the fact that this is extremely complex science that has been oversimplified in the media to basically take away our freedom of choice...

Vaccine requirements and mandates are based on the faulty assumption that the vaccines in question prevent transmission of the pathogen. Does the vaccine for DTaP prevent transmission? No. Does the vaccine for Flu prevent transmission? No. Do the vaccines for Covid prevent transmission? No. In fact they were never designed to do that...

So you’re asking ‘what about this 95% effectiveness?’ If you look at those clinical trials, they do not say that they prevent transmission. They expressly say that they’re measuring whether they attenuate (reduce, lessen, weaken—DLT) symptoms...

They’re 95% effective based on their clinical trials at attenuating symptoms for the first variant, which is essentially gone in our population. Right now the predominant variant is the Delta, and CDC director Wilinsky basically said that these vaccines have no ability to prevent infection by and transmission of the Delta variant.”
End Excerpt

Additional Notes
She goes on to explain how the vaccines do not prevent infection of the mucosa, which is what the virus infects. She also quotes a recent study indicating that the “vaccinated and unvaccinated have similar amounts of viruses in their nose and throat.” She cites CDC tracking in a particular instance indicating 74% of 469 cases were vaccinated and 4 out of 5 hospitalized had been vaccinated. She claims the CDC and health agencies are misleading the public. She offers several more startling facts.

Dr. Ryan Cole #StopTheMandate
Dr. Ryan Cole is a Board Certified Anatomic and Clinical Pathologist trained at the Mayo Clinic. He has a subspecialty expertise and fellowship training in skin pathology. He claims “expert” status in immunology and virology with one of his board certifications in clinical pathology involving virology. He did a year of Ph.D. immunology research his first year of medical school, as well. He has been in practice for approximately 18 years and is licensed in 12 states. He runs the largest, Independent full-service laboratory in the State of Idaho. “So virology and immunology—full lab medicine—is what I do,” He says.

Begin Excerpt at Timestamp 11:41
“But here’s what I’m seeing in the laboratory, already. And this is very-very concerning. When we did these shots, we can look at the types of white blood cells in the body. We can look at your T cells, your B cells—the ratio—and you have a broad array of immune cells that work together, that are to fight-off viruses, to keep cancers in check. We’re already seeing the signals in the laboratory of decreases of certain critically important T cells that you need—your innate immune system. It’s—it’s your marines of your body—the first ones in, fighting off viruses, fighting off cancers. It’s why kids have done phenomenally well and survived this virus at a 100% rate statistically this year. Because they have an innate T cell immune response that has two to three times the activity of an adult T cell immune response. They have two to three times the enzymes that throw the little hand grenades in the cells and blow-up the infected cells, compared to adults. And that’s why kids have done so wonderful against this virus.

But what we’re seeing in the laboratory, after people get these shots, we’re seeing a very concerning locked-in, low profile of these important killer T cells that you want in your body. It’s almost a reverse HIV. In HIV you lose your helper T cells, your CD4 cells. In this virus, post vaccine, what we’re seeing is a drop in your killer T cells—your CD8 cells. And what do CD8 cells do? They keep all other viruses in check. What am I seeing in the laboratory? I’m seeing an uptick of herpes family virus; I’m seeing herpes, I’m seeing shingles, I’m seeing mono. I’m seeing a huge uptick in human papillomavirus (common virus that can cause late-life cancers—DLT) in the cervical biopsies and cervical pap smears in women.

In addition to that there’s a little infectious—you know—bump that kids get called Molluscum contagiosum. What do you need to keep that in check? You need CD8—uh, killer T cells. I am seeing a 20 times increase in individuals over the age of 50 of this little bump and rash. You know, that’s innocuous, but what it tells me is the immune status of these individuals who’ve gotten the shot. We’re literally weakening the immune system of these individuals.

Now most concerning of all is there is a pattern of these types of immune cells in the body that keep cancer in check. Well, since January 1 (2021—DLT) in the laboratory I’ve seen a 20 times increase of Endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis. A 20 times increase. I’m not exaggerating at all—because I look at my numbers year over year. I’m like, ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many Endometrial cancers before.’ I’m seeing invasive melanomas in younger patents. Normally we catch those early and they’re thin melanomas. I’m seeing thick melanomas skyrocketing in the last month or two.

Um, I’m already seeing the early signals and we are modifying the immune system to a weakened state. Great study out of Germany that looked at these profiles on young individuals, after the Pfizer, showing this locked-in—and we don’t know how long. Maybe the immune system—you know, it’s going to regenerate and those ratios will go back up. But who’s studying it? And where are the long term trials? Two months, four months. How long is this profile locked-in? We don’t know. And how—how long is it going to last—two to three years? What—what is going to be the uptick in these solid tumor cancers over the next two, three, four, five years? We don’t know. I can predict. I’m a data analyst. I’m not a politician. I look at data and I’m already seeing concerning patterns.

And so to say to somebody, ‘In order to maintain your job you need to put your body at risk and let us change your immune status—for potentially a lifetime—and put you at risk for autoimmune disease, cancer—’ Here’s, here’s a very-very important one. In the Pfizer application to the FDA— Now the prob—the problem with most of these shots is we didn’t do animal trials before doing human trials. The humans were essentially the Guinea pigs. And in one of their addendums that they throw in, it shows their study on rats in fertility. And we’ve heard, you know, inklings within the media and some scientific reporting, ‘Well, what’s going to be the fertility long term outcome?’ The honest answer is, we don’t know. But in the Pfizer study the fertility rate was decreased by 16%. Now 16%, you think, ‘eh, that’s not a whole lot.’ Well, rats are one of the most fertility creatures on the planet Earth. A 16% decrease in fertility in rats is at least a signal that says to us, ‘We need to by hyper-cautious about what we’re doing.’

And again, an experiment on humanity, and to coerce somebody into an experiment in order to keep their gainful employment—it’s a violation of all medical ethics. I mean, this is pure malfeasance. From administrators and, and—I—I think at some point my physician colleagues may wake-up from their stupor and trance that they’re in and reflect upon the harm that they are doing upon humanity.”
End Excerpt at Timestamp 16:44

Additional Notes
He continues, addressing the alleged “science” and that the outcome of what is being done is unknown.

FDA Adds a Warning To Covid-19 Vaccines About Risk of Heart Inflammation

The Food and Drug Administration’s Recall of At Least 1,692 Regulated Products As of August 20, 2021
Recalls, Market Withdrawals & Safety Alerts
An example of the fallibility of government guidance.

Clinical Considerations: Myocarditis and Pericarditis After Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Among Adolescents And Young Adults

Heart Inflammation, AKA Endocarditis, Myocarditis, Pericarditis
At Expandable Headline “Living with” and Sub-headline “Learn the warning signs of serious complications.”

Heart Inflammation In Young Men Higher Than Expected After Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines—U.S. CDC

18 CT Teens Report Heart Problems After Coronavirus Vaccine

Oregon Teen Who Said His Heart Hurt was Hospitalized With Myocarditis After COVID-19 Vaccination

Evan Moru: Kenmore Teen Develops Mycarditis After 2nd Vaccine Shot; CDC Investigating Possible Rare Side Effect
“Rare?” I ask. Really?

A few Initial COVID-19 Death and “Adverse Reaction” Reports at

Joel Kallman
Oracle APEX software developer
Designed the CDC vaccine tracking system
Died two months after mRNA shot
There is a report from a friend of Kallman who indicated that the software developer had an existing brain tumor issue. I haven’t included that link and this is the only one in this list for which I found a suggestion of an existing medical issue that may not have been caused by the vaccine—DLT.

Lisa Shaw
44-year-old BBC Radio voice
Died after suffering blood clots following AstraZeneca shot

Lisa Stonehouse
52-year-old Canadian woman
Developed blood clots in brain
Died 12 days after AstraZeneca shot

Lynnae Erick
50-year-old Canadian woman
Died seven days after the experimental Pfizer mRNA injection

Jennifer Gibson
Canadian woman
Developed Bell’s Palsy two weeks after AstraZeneca shot

Jovita Moore
Atlanta news anchor
Developed two brain tumors 12 days after second Pfizer mRNA injection

More details regarding the above reported deaths and complications at
Developer of CDC Vaccine Tracking System DIED After COVID-19 Injections

Simone Scott
19-year-old Northwestern University freshman
Developed myocarditis
Receives heart transplant
Died six weeks after second Moderna mRNA injection
“The adverse effects were immediate…”

Camilla Canepa
18-year-old from Sestri Levante
Vaccinated with AstraZeneca, died

And this list is just an infinitesimal representation of evidence that puts a “face” on what is happening. There is a WORLD of related evidence out there and it is cumulatively beyond anecdotal observation.

Up until now, your health was a private matter into which no one had a right to intrude. And actually, when the hand-wringing hysteria of the systemic agenda-driven masses is removed from the equation, it is still a private matter. Unfortunately, instead of dealing with just reality, one must now also deal with the Potemkin village of mRNA vaccine efficacy being presently perpetuated.

Thus it is that while a person may refuse a vaccine—even one licensed for use—when the federal government and employers are making employment and societal interaction contingent on such a vaccination, a principled stand is necessary to avoid falling into the line of lambs led to slaughter. First, know your rights and if facing a mandated vaccine, consult with sources that can best advise on options or represent you if you choose to litigate.

One source to utilize in this regard is Pacific Justice Institute (PJI), a non-profit legal defense organization supporting religious freedom, parental rights and civil liberties.11 The organization is involved with mRNA vaccine-related litigation cases. At their web site you can request legal assistance. For free you can watch their previous and current Zoom calls concerning mRNA vacinations.12 If you have a religious objection to an mRNA vaccine and are intent on using a form to convey this, then seek the legal advice about the content of such forms that are offered by attorneys or organizations such as PJI.

You can also avail yourself of the many Internet sources regarding COVID-19-related litigation, laws, mandates and news. For example, offers links to the COVID-19-related legislative, regulatory and executive order information of each state.13 by Fastcase is a fee-based service for attorneys and legal professionals that also provides a weekly cumulative 10 free searches/downloads of court documents and pleadings (that’s the official name for documents constituting complaints or lawsuits when filed with courts). I have “preset” the premium COVID-19 search parameters as part of the URL in the links at footnote 14 in the Sources and References below.14 For official COVID-19/vaccine policies, mandates and positions announced by or for cities, municipalities and regions, visit the website of the National League of Cities (claiming 2,472 nationwide members). Scroll to mid-page and search by city, state, policy area or action description. For action description the single word “mandate” offers better data than the two word term, “vaccine mandate.”15 provides similar information but focuses on COVID-19 travel restrictions via executive orders; Just scroll to, or click the state of your choice on their web page.16

Insofar as employment, you can network with your like-minded friends, look for remote from home employment or consult “No Vax Mandate” job boards that are appearing to fill this need. Three that have come to my attention are Gab’s No Vax Mandate Job Board,17’s No Vax Mandate Job Board18 and Red Balloon.19

While the State of the Union in which you preside can play an important role in this matter, one thing is clear: Thousands upon thousands (possibly untold multiples of those thousands upon thousands) of reports surpasses any reasonable standard being attributed to anecdotal evidence of mRNA vaccine-related disabilities and death.

As for me, I do not think all these people are lying and they are a part of the evidence sufficient to indicate mRNA vaccines are the impetus of these horrible outcomes. Hence, my moral, conscientious objection (and an unspecified percentage of religious objection). An mRNA vaccine will expose me to potential disability and death by altering me at molecular level in ways that God neither designed nor intended.

In the end it is you who must decide what evidence you are willing to accept and what consequences you are willing to risk. And to quote one of my favorite movie lines, “Some things are true whether you believe in them or not.”

Sources and References

1 COVID-19 Vaccines Are a Voluntary Option, Not Mandatory
And Quote The FDA on This When Asserting Your Right to Refuse

   The Article on Facebook

   Gab Post With Excerpt Linking to Article

2 Federal Law Prohibits Mandates of Emergency Use COVID Vaccines

3 How Many Cells Are In The Human Body? Fast Facts

4 What Is RNA?

5 What Is a Protein?

6 What Is a RNA?
Op Cited.

7 Ibid

8 What Are mRNA Vaccines And How Do They Work?

9 Shocking Study Reveals mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines May Progressively Degenerate Your Brain From Prior Disease

10Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Data documented and co-managed by the CDC and the FDA

  OpenVAERS Project
CDC/FDA VAERS data displayed in easier to browse and comprehend interface.

11Pacific Justice Institute

  Welcome to the Pacific Justice Institute

12Pacific Justice Institute | Recent Zoom Calls | Legislative Action & Regulatory Agency Response Updates
Click on a state to view legislative, regulatory, and executive order information with a link to full text reports for each measure. | “Vaccine Mandate” Court Records Search For Last 30 Days
Right-click to save/download items because every link clicked (even if re-clicking a visited item) reduces the weekly available free searches | “COVID-19” or “Coronavirus” Court Records Search For Last 30 Days
Right-click to save/download items because every link clicked (even if re-clicking a visited item) reduces the weekly available free searches | New “COVID-19” or “Coronavirus” Complaints/Pleadings Search For Last 30 Days
Right-click to save/download items because every link clicked (even if re-clicking a visited item) reduces the weekly available free searches | New “Vaccine Mandate” Complaints/Pleadings Search For Last 30 Days
Right-click to save/download items because every link clicked (even if re-clicking a visited item) reduces the weekly available free searches | All Legal Dockets/Documents Mentioning “Coronavirus” / “COVID-19” / “Vaccine Mandate”
Right-click to save/download items because every link clicked (even if re-clicking a visited item) reduces the weekly available free searches

15National League of Cities | COVID-19 Local Action Tracker | COVID-19 State Resources & Travel Restrictions

17Gab | No Vax Mandate Job Board | No Vax Mandate Job Board

19Red Balloon | Free To Work

Further Suggested Reading

   Vitamin C Index: Publications, Research and Videos (The C-Index)

   The C-Index | Coronavirus • COVID-19 Directory